Login
Register
×
Home
About
Services
Punjabi Tutor
English Tutor
Punjabi Practice
English Practice
Punjabi Mock
English Mock
Punjabi Chunk
English Chunk
Blog
Verify
Contact us
☰
Home
About
Services
Typing
Punjabi Tutor
English Tutor
Punjabi Practice
English Practice
Punjabi Mock
English Mock
Punjabi Chunk
English Chunk
Blog
Verify
Contact us
Ranjeet Online Typing
Name:
Guest
ID:
0000
Time:
10
SET Time
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Auto Scroll
Font Size:
Paragraph Words:
XXX
Typing paragraph
That was a jolly story which Mr.Arthur Ransome told the other day in one of his messages from pertrograd. A stout old lady was walking with her basket down the middle of a street in Petrograd to the great confusion of the traffic and with no small peril to herself. It was pointed out to her that the pavement was the place for foot passengers, but she replied: 'I' m going to walk where I like. We've got liberty now.' It did not occur to the dead old lady that if liberty entitled the foot passenger to walk down the middle of a road, it also entitled the car driver to drive on the pavement, and that the end of such liberty would be universal chaos. Everybody would be getting in everybody else's way and nobody would get anywhere. Individual liberty would be getting in everybody else's way and nobody would get anywhere. Individual liberty would have become social anarchy. There is a danger of the world getting liberty-drunk in these days like the old lady with the basket, and it is just as well to remind ourselves of what the rule of the road means. It means that in order that the liberties of all may be preserved, the liveries of everybody must be curtailed. When the policeman, say at Picadilly Circus, steps into the middle of the road and puts out his hand, he is the symbol not of tyranny, but of liberty. You may not think so, you may, being in a hurry and seeing your motor car pulled up by this insolence of office, feel that your liberty has been outraged. How dare this fellow interfere with your free use of the public highway? Then, if you are a reasonable person, you will reflect that if he did not, incidentally, interfere with you he would interfere with no one, and the result would be that Piccadilly Circus would be a maelstrom that you would never cross at all. You have submitted to a curtailment of private liberty in order that you may enjoy a social order which makes your liberty a reality.
Type:
0
Correct:
0
Wrong:
0
Normal Mode
Hide All
Hide Highlighter
Hide Info
Type Here
Paragraph By :
Internet
App. Ver.:
Fully compatible with Latest Firefox & Chrome browser.